35 Comments
User's avatar
RedFire's avatar

In what world would anyone want a terrorist sponsoring regime to get anywhere close to a bomb?

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Who determines who can have the bomb?

A clique of imperialists who expanded via slavery and apartheid.

Why is having something a threat, unless the one that feels threat is the bully?!

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

What’s a “pro troll” genius?

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

No idea what you’re saying

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Why did you say this after giving me the question? Did you understand anything or not? 😂

PalmsFour

2h

Who determines anything?

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

It’s power, Im agreeing

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

But in the other post you said

PalmsFour

2h

No idea what you’re saying

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

Who determines anything?

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

The ones who have the power.

Expand full comment
Kresge's avatar

You mean like the U.S.?

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

Why are you anti American I don’t understand

Expand full comment
Kresge's avatar

I love America. I hate the elites, war and USG ops

Expand full comment
Magic Girl's avatar

You mean like ISUS, both with nuclear weapons?

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

ISIS and Iran regime two sides of same coin

Expand full comment
Magic Girl's avatar

Not quite. The IRGC was actively helping remove the ISIS threat from Iraq while it was under US occupation (still is), back when Drumpfenfeffer Incorporated assassinated General Soleimani in 2020. US precisely targeted Soleimani with a drone at the Iraq airport because he was exposing the US’s game in utilizing ISIS wherever governments in the crossfire of US regime change won’t obey. It’s well known and on the Congressional record that when she was an elected US House representative, Tulsi Gabbard exposed this in 2016 and even got some legislation passed to end funding of terrorist groups in use by US. Even Israel was providing them food and medical care during the Dirty War on Syria, as they were anchored in the country to help oust Assad, which was the goal of the United States. And now the ISIS dude is heading the government there and has become a darling of the US government and media! Also the fact that Iran is majority Shia Muslim, and ISIS is a Sunni organization with an ideology rooted in Salafi jihadism — a branch of Sunni Islam, not Shiite Islam — that incorporates elements of Wahhabism and Qutbism, radical ideologies that are not shared whatsoever by the Iranian government or its people. So, you have it all wrong.

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

Yes, the regime in Iran is really a peaceful one, similar to Aruba in the Caribbean. They’re against terrorism! Can’t believe we had it all wrong.

Expand full comment
Magic Girl's avatar

You do have it wrong, and now you have the facts. Time to change up your prescribed rhetoric because it makes you look really, really dumb and very uninformed. Iran is a peaceful government. Iran is not attacking anyone. It is not a regime. It is resistance to US empire and it will strike back when hit. It is an elected government, too, in case you did not know. The people vote just like they do in the US.

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

Of course. Just minding their own business. I didn’t insult you personally, but thank you for attacking me.

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

Tracy I like but he’s not persuasive on foreign policy- he’s listing a set of grievances

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

There were American Hostages being held. Other than that, Witkoff’s early successes have fizzled.

Expand full comment
Nancy Sack's avatar

I am promoting my campaign to be the new president and treasurer of all nonprofits, and then we are all going to stand up together and invoke the Declaration of Independence. We are taking back our consent to be governed by this corrupt government. Google me, Sassy Grace Woodruff, Nancy K Woodruff, Nancy k Sack.

Nonprofits are not owned by their creators. They are owned by the entire public as they are public corporations. When a nonprofit is breaking its bylaws, and they all are, then anyone of the public can call a vote for new leadership of any nonprofit. I am asking for all of them. I can hold two offices, president and treasurer, so that I have control of the money and can spend it as I please. If you see somebody who is hungry and you have the means to feed them and you don't do it your faith is dead. A nonprofit is only for humanitarian reasons and if they have any money in the bank and someone is hungry, they must feed them or they are breaking their bylaws.

Nonprofit means no money in the bank if someone is in need. A true nonprofit is capable of spending all the incoming money, so that it circles around and comes back. The Bible says every seven years the church must declare jubilee, which means no one owes debt anymore except for their property, and every third seven years which is 21 years they are debt-free including all property. I have never heard of a Jubilee ever taking place but that's what I plan to do when everyone chooses me to be the new president and treasurer of all those trillions and trillions of dollars.

Familiar nonprofits are Bill Gates's foundation, Warren Buffett's foundation, World Vision, Feed the Children, Red Cross, the Catholic Church, the Baptist Church, the Pentecostal church, Jehovah's Witnesses, the Mormons, Islam's nonprofits, Salvation Army, Boys and Girls Clubs, Feeding America, United Way, UNICEF, American Heart Association, Goodwill, Rockefeller foundation, and so many more!

Once we are taking care of ourselves, there is absolutely nothing the government can do when we take back our consent to be governed, because that's what the Declaration of Independence tells us to do.

When, in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands, which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station, to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind, requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created, equal that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the CONSENT of the governed.

That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter, or to abolish it, and institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall see most likely to affect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that mankind are more DISPOSED to SUFFER, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future Security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of the people of the United States, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of Government. The history of the US Presidents is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct objection the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the United States. To prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world.

The presidents have refused their assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

TIME TO ADD YOUR GRIEVANCES TO THE LIST THAT IS WAY LONGER THAN THEY HAD AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND. WE SHALL FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT WHERE ALL MEN AND WOMEN AND CHILDREN, REGARDLESS OF THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN, OR WHERE THEY CAME FROM SHALL BE EQUAL! Make life fair for all.

Expand full comment
Magic Girl's avatar

You're a lightweight.

Expand full comment
Vanusha's avatar

yes, some people profited from the fall of the Soviet Union - mainly the mafia.

Expand full comment
Jon Saxton's avatar

Trump’s disinformation before the Israeli attack on Iran and his ongoing ‘maybe I will and maybe I won’t’ is most likely to be him trying to cover himself re: Putin.

Expand full comment
RedFire's avatar

Italians/Jews in NYC are sort of interchangeable in many ways - true. Levin- Tracy is correct. That voice is tough to take

Expand full comment