Cooper poses as the stoic truth-teller, but under scrutiny he reveals the full Cluster B repertoire: mean-girl gossip, defamation, veiled threats, and brittle histrionics. His cultivated masculine pose collapses into something closer to an Amber Heard performance — the theatrics of grievance and fragility.
The narcissism is obvious. He casts himself as the keeper of hidden truths, yet reacts to factual correction as though it were a mortal insult. The histrionics soon follow: melodrama about tone, wounded ego, endless complaint, and the schoolgirl tactic of turning substance into gossip.
Then comes the darker note: defamation — insinuating Tracey “runs cover for pedophiles” — and even veiled threats of violence, deployed when facts proved inconvenient. And in classic borderline fashion, he oscillates wildly: one day declaring “never contact me again,” the next day reappearing with a fresh outburst. After nearly two weeks of supposed “bereavement” (while tweeting daily), he still produced nothing of his own — until “Mel the Crazy Village Lady” released her KGB-style thread, which he promptly plagiarized, passing off its inventions as his own research.
The net effect is not toughness but fragility. By Tracey’s standard of rigor, Cooper simply could not hold the line. Faced with exposure, he failed, and revealed himself for what he is: a Cluster B mean girl in the borrowed costume of a stoic.
lol you cast yourself as an intrepid journalist, just following evidence… but yet in the face of overwhelming evidence you dig in to be a contrarian. Save your “well I was called a contrarian before and I was right then”. A broken clock is right once a day. Stop clout chasing, it’s so unbecoming.
He is a Nazi-apologist who mixes some actual facts about the WW1-WW2 period with other highly misleading and subjective quotes and outright lies etc. to try to show the Nazis as victims when in fact they were the perpetrators. And in good Nazi propagandist style, he works hard to paint the Soviet Union in as black a way as possible - rather than accepting their role in saving the world from the Nazi scourge.
His anti-Israel bent does not stem from any feeling about the Palestinians (untermensch) but just good 'ole anti-semitism. I do wonder if he is not controlled opposition to heap the stench of anti-semitism across all who question the official Epstein narrative or question the myths of WW2.
> he works hard to paint the Soviet Union in as black a way as possible
It's hard not to. Regardless of Martyr Made's views on Germany, the USSR did ally with the Nazis to get the eastern half of Poland (and the Baltic states). That enabled Hitler quite a bit, no? Then, they attacked Finland and performed poorly (possibly inspiring Hitler to underestimate Soviet military capabilities). Stalin was no boy scout and is on the level of Hitler, but only one of them lost a war so there's that. And that's just to 1940.
Stalin spent the 1930s attempting to get France and Britain to join an anti-Germany front and failed. After that, Stalin took part of Poland to move the starting point for Barbarossa much farther away from Moscow - a masterstroke that saved the Soviet Union. He never allied with Nazi Germany.
You are just repeating Nazi and Cold War propaganda, pathetic. Of course Stalin was no boy scout, he had to get the Soviet Union ready to fight the Nazis. It is laughable how much the Finns think they won their war with the Soviet Union, as with their current idiocy.
Absolutely not true, seems that you are a Cooper apologist hiding behind a trite misleading statement. Tariq Ali was never called a Nazi apologist for detailing the utter incompetence of Churchill and also his crimes.
Also, the OPR report says that there was no technical obligation to notify the “victims” because the CVRA Act requires such notification only AFTER federal charges have been filed. And because the NPA prevented any federal charges from being filed, Acosta’s office did not violate the CVRA. Nevertheless, as an ETHICAL matter, the OPR said they should have been notified. But this is another nuance that people who don’t read the source documents seem to miss.
This whole episode and similar episodes where so many get really riled up over the objective research Michael Tracey has done has been really illuminating into the psyche of a certain type of online influencer on the right, and into the psyche of those not-so-influential who see pedophilia as a major issue among so-called "cabal" of elites. This is happening I believe because to those people the issue of pedophilia is tied up in their worldview as a central node within a larger sphere of horrible things that are being hidden by mainstream media about the ruling class. It is the reason the Q phenomena gained such credibility even though their belief in it was based on an extremely unlikely set of propositions. Why are they so quick to believe those things with such little proof, and then become so quick to denounce those who disagree with their belief system?
The idea of a cabal of elite pedophiles ruling the western world has essentially become like a religion to those people. What I mean is that a religion creates a worldview for people to anchor them in what they believe to be "reality." Which is why when people's religions are questioned by others many people get really upset with them. Because their anchor to reality is being shaken many react violently as a defense mechanism. To those whose false worldview of a cabal of pedophile elites ruling over us, that belief being shaken can be upsetting also because they have invested so much time and or money in supporting people and causes which they believe are fighting against "the cabal." Cognitive dissonance sets in and that can be especially upsetting if you have given a lot of money away based on a lie, or at least a big exaggeration, e.g., people who you believed were fighting "the cabal" and who you supported with lots of money are then exposed as either poor researchers or outright grifters knowingly conning you.
Look how they react to simple questions being raised by Michael Tracey as to the veracity of various objective facts--instead of a rational response of welcoming correction into their belief system, they attempt to destroy the credibility of Michael Tracey. This can be written off from paid influencers as Michael challenging the future of what they see as their income stream, but to those without that monetary relationship to Michael's journalism, it is reality itself that Michael is upending.
Total evisceration. I'd ask "how could Cooper possibly come back from this" but the answer is obviously that he'll just rely on his fellow grifters and idiotic audience to completely ignore it.
“'I’m not a lawyer,' Cooper concedes. 'I apparently said that Judge Marra’s 2019 ruling invalidated the 2007 non-prosecution agreement… that wasn’t exactly right.' Hey Darryl, I’m not a lawyer either. I’m just a 'social media poster,' as you put it."
Has Michael Tracey lost his marbles? This childish bickering is CRAZY. Just take the Win Michael and leave Cooper the heck alone. You are becoming a bit obsessed and creepy. Spend a weekend at the Jersey Shore or something! Cape May is nice.
Michael is continuing a conversation. It would seem very strange if he failed to respond to Darryl's latest attack -- which came after Darryl promised never to contact him again -- especially considering the factual errors within that attack.
You’re ignoring the most basic rule of engagement: once the fight starts, you keep hitting the opponent until he stops moving or taps out. Cooper is a broken man now, his credibility and reputation in tatters, and never to be recovered.
Popular sure, so is Justin Bieber so what. He’s disgraced. That’s what matters. I care not one whit for those too stupid to recognize that, regardless of their bulk.
That's because Amreekans are dumb as dirt and prefer to stay that way. Michael is way too cerebral and dogged for the Cooper Clique. Go back to your easy peasy stage show where the MAGA crowd held up the Epstein Files binders given to them that contained absolutely nothing. That was hilarious, and that's what you prefer.
Crazy Lady Mel isn’t some “random X account”….she’s (if she is indeed a women instead of a Pakistani or Iranian bot) is one of the most vile Jew hating, Holocaust deniers, Protocols of Zions quoting filth on X. So right up Darrly Cooper’s alley.
Bull💩. Check out the X feed of this absolute lunatic. Then please tell us whether she is just so concerned with the “plight poor palestians and those mean Zionists” or whether there is something else at play in her diseased mind.
I don’t have X, but Glenn Greenwald interviewed her a couple of weeks ago, and she didn’t come across as an “absolute lunatic” at all — or do you characterize everyone who objects to the Israeli slaughter of civilians the same way?
Cooper is probably realizing that he has been caught cutting corners in a business where that matters. Maybe some of his contrarian takes do have merit, but unfortunately if he wants to make bold assertions, he can’t be fast and loose with the facts. I thought some of the Martyr Made podcasts were interesting but his credibility has taken a self-inflicted wound by his not having “journalistic standards”, those pesky things that keep bullshit from going mainstream (when they are applied). If he is going to be in the truth-giving business, he has to have better, not worse, standards for not peddling bullshit.
You are coming off like a jilted lover. Fatal Attraction vibes. The facts are now irrelevant and the focus is shifting to your motivations here. It can't be pure truth-telling given the level of malice. You are revealing much about yourself and its not good.
I do not follow Darryl Cooper. It is unnecessary to consider the work of a “historian” who gets the Holocaust and WWII wrong. Furthermore, anyone who follows Cooper to learn the truth about WWII or Epstein or anything else is likely a “low-info follower.” But on the Epstein story, most people are “low-info.” Who, other than journalists or someone directly involved would have the time or inclination to investigate it.
This is why a government and media that so often lie is so dangerous. If, to take one glaring example, the Hunter Biden laptop can be reported to be the product of Russian disinformation, when it obviously was not, it becomes a lot easier to believe that the opaque and disturbing allegations about Epstein are being covered up. This opens the door for the Darryl Coopers to pose as truth tellers.
Seems Cooper is beholden to vanity. End of. Not a good look for a 'serious' researcher in controversial fields. It's not so much his 'errors' that weigh against him, it's his bending of the facts to support his 'narrative' and his ad hominem manner of delivery, complete with unsavoury insinuations. These flicks of the viper, I've come to recognise, are when it is cornered. Just carry on Michael through the jungle! You're doing a great service to truth and justice.
The fact that this man can still have credibility with anyone after such a takedown is concerning, to say the least.
I am curious why you didn't take him to task though for his quibbling with the language of denial in the DOJ report. He claims to be no lawyer, but proceeds with a Talmudic argument distinguishing "told" (daily beast hearsay) from "having knowledge of" (DOJ under oath), purporting the denial of the latter to be of less consequence because knowledge requires a high threshold.
I'm not a lawyer, by any means, but that seems like a pretty weasely justification around his insistence around an intelligence connection. Thoughts?
Long winded bag of shit, Michael still hasn’t responded to my post. This is the fourth time I’ve posted this. Defending the honor of pedophiles while demanding the attention of journalists is the end of Tracy’s career and possibly his sanity. When you find a bridge to live under be sure to share your stupidity. You can beg for subscribers there too.
Why do you appear to be defending the honor of a man who plead guilty to pedophilia, in spite of his legion of amazing defense attorneys?
Was serial fabulist Virginia Giuffre a horrible lying whore? If so, one would think his defense team would have blown her to pieces. Instead, according to recent stuttering defense of Epstein on your pod cast with Thad Russell, you assert she was awarded between 10 -30 million dollars. How do you explain that? Is she a whore or a criminal mastermind? A Robin Hood for sluts! She took Dershowitz’s most famous client down, but couldn’t take a dime from Dershowitz?
Then in the same rambling pig of an interview, you got mixed up about “which” 14 year old girl you were smearing. So now we know that there were at least two 14 year old girls doing god knows what with a guy who recruits girls from high schools. But to suggest that he didn’t know their ages? The problem isn’t that he didn’t know. The recruiting girls from high schools would be the thing that triggered alarm bells. Also, you defending or parsing the crime seems creepy as fuck. If I were casting a creepy pedo for a movie, your physical appearance would make you a natural candidate.
You asking for a definition of “Epstein space” is childish and inconsistent with “polite E-mail”. You will recoil and feign indignation at my assessment. Because you pretend to be autistic and lacking in social awareness. Which is why I will never write you a “polite” anything. But while we’re on the subject, where have you been with your mad journo skills for the last 20 years pertaining to this story.
When “you think about it for five minutes, because Acosta in fact did not leave Epstein alone”? In the first 5 seconds I’m wondering why the fuck the feds were even involved? Additionally, I’m wondering “why the light sentence” and what the fuck did he “actually” do if that is what he plead to with Dershowitz as his attorney. How would you possibly know the extent of their efforts to thwart Acosta or their sincerity? Maybe they knew they were going to get off easy at sentencing. Maybe the proceedings were intended to pacify locals in the community who were asking too many questions and the feds were afraid of disclosure at a hearing.
You whine like a broken record about how the women involved got so much money for being sluts. But cling to Guiffre like a life preserver because if you get too far down the road of credibility the numbers are overwhelming. Both in girls/women and settlement dollars.
Why bring up Podesta? The FBI wants the Seth Rich laptop sealed forever. The pizza gate reference seems like you’re trying to defame cooper broadly instead of staying with the topic at hand. Like if I inserted something about your beheaded babies lies.
Tracey concerning Acosta calling Epstein an intelligence asset:
“Acosta replied under penalty of perjury, “The answer is no.”
Hey retard! Politicians and government officials lie under oath all the time. That’s sort of the whole Epstein thing. Lying, obfuscations, way too many questions and very ridiculous answers.
The suicide. The broken cameras and “lazy” guards. The release of dubious footage 5 years later. The odd autopsy protocol.
The shear number of girls and the money they received when a super sleuth like Micheal Tracey could have sent those scandalous whores packing. Which is really odd given his superstar defense attorneys.
Dershowitz introduction to Epstein through lady Rothschild. Bill Barrs daddy hiring him at his school without a teaching certificate. Maxwells daddy’s intelligence and media ties. His mysterious death. A virtual who’s who of powerful turds wrapped around the axels of this bullshit. And don’t forget the weird stuff at his home. Including a first edition of “Lolita”. Which you conveniently left out of your article when you referenced the “Lolita Express”. Wasn’t that the kind of omission you were whining about?
In case your garbage isn’t gross enough, there’s a real jealousy thread about the girls. Is it because they have lots of money by virtue of tricking filthy rich motherfuckers and their incompetent attorneys? Face it. You’re a shitty journalist, and you will always be broke. That’s not the fault of either of the 14 year old girls you mixed up. Or anyone else. Maybe find another profession.
Why would he respond to your garbage? He is a journalist doing his job of questioning "facts" stated by someone who puts himself forward as a "truth teller". You are simply attempting to smear someone because he is pointing holes in Cooper's statements. Maybe you should just STFU with your very obvious attempt to shoot the messenger.
Great question. Why would actual journalists be interested in debating a blow hard ass hole who spent a month criticizing a dead woman while ignoring the totality of the evidence. Tracey and mouth breathers like you think you’re owed an explanation. You’re really not owed a fucking thing. Especially when Tracey was completely exposed as a Zionist tool concerning dead babies. He’s doing it again by purporting that all the Israel connections can be ignored because Virginia Giuffre was a crazy whore. You should stfu. But you seem intent on defending a predator or protecting intelligence extortion. Keep running your cunt mouth. Fans of Tracey and his work should be identified as child molester advocates. Thanks
You and cooper are 2 peas in a pod. In lieu of providing actual substantive evidence to back up what you’ve saying you start screeching like the drama queens you are. It’s really very funny to observe.
Why should Michael respond to you? All you do is come out here and insult him. And if he were to view your Substack like I did this morning, he would find that all you do is attack him there when you’re not obsessing over Israel.
How is he defending the honor of Epstein? All he is doing is pointing out the grand narratives about Epstein being the ring leader of some international Cabal of pedos lacks a lot of credible evidence. What was it that Carl Sagan used to say? Extraordinary claims require extra extraordinary evidence.
As far as Giuffre, have you not seen what her own lawyers wrote that she “” fictionalized”(their words) most of her trafficking stories in her unpublished memoir? Or that if she was such an ace in the hole witness, why didn’t the Feds calls her up when they prosecuted Maxwell?
The reason Michael zeros in on Giuffre is because she’s the linchpin to the story being greater than it is. Without Giuffre, Epstein is nothing more than a wealthy pervert that prays on teenagers, with Giuffre, it becomes a sinister conspiracy theory.
It’s so funny. The only reason Michael engages with the Whitney Webbs, Nick Bryant’s and Darryl Cooper’s it’s because of his critics. Then he takes a journalistic Occam’s razor to their work and then gets criticized again. Michael can’t win for lose with you guys. If he doesn’t address their work, he’s accused of cherry picking his targets, but if he does engage with their work, then suddenly he’s a horrible monster for daring to not genuflect before the alter of the Great Sage of Idaho or Her Majesty Whitney Webb
The reason he zeros in on Giuffre is because she’s damaged. Not to mention, incapable of defending herself. Tracey claims that she has received 10 to 30 million dollars. 150 other women have received millions. Why constantly bemoan Giuffre? Why constantly parse the 2007 NPA in the most Epstein favorable way? He plead guilty to sex with a minor. With the most kick ass attorneys available. But somehow, in your feeble mind, if Giuffre is garbage, everything else is somehow conspiracy?
Robert Maxwell was a media mogul who had intelligence ties.
A who’s who of scumbags interacted with Epstein.
A parade of Israeli prime ministers visited his home.
Epstein’s murder/suicide/disappearance is shrouded in super unhelpful coincidences.
Those who participated in these activities have a vested interest in creating doubt centered on a dead girl. Which is particularly curious given the fact that the crazy dead girl is on the verge of releasing a new book.
It’s also curious no one thought to sue or criticize Webb until now concerning her sourcing or accusations. This party has been going on for a long while. Where was fat fuck for the last nearly 20 years?
You mean the very book her own lawyers admitted in court was highly ‘fictionalized’ ? I am sure Clinton, Noam Chomsky, Lex Wexner and others were shaking in their boots at the thought of a novel coming out
Ok. Stipulated. Then why did rich people bury these victims in money? If she is completely broken and a horrible witness, fair enough. What about the other 150 “victims “? Frankly, I feel as if the victims were made whole. It’s the blackmail that ensued that should be prosecuted. The idea that no one has the video is bullshit. Using government documents to prove that there is no crime, in 2025 is absurd. Whatever the government or MSM says the loudest, start looking for lies and propaganda
Cooper poses as the stoic truth-teller, but under scrutiny he reveals the full Cluster B repertoire: mean-girl gossip, defamation, veiled threats, and brittle histrionics. His cultivated masculine pose collapses into something closer to an Amber Heard performance — the theatrics of grievance and fragility.
The narcissism is obvious. He casts himself as the keeper of hidden truths, yet reacts to factual correction as though it were a mortal insult. The histrionics soon follow: melodrama about tone, wounded ego, endless complaint, and the schoolgirl tactic of turning substance into gossip.
Then comes the darker note: defamation — insinuating Tracey “runs cover for pedophiles” — and even veiled threats of violence, deployed when facts proved inconvenient. And in classic borderline fashion, he oscillates wildly: one day declaring “never contact me again,” the next day reappearing with a fresh outburst. After nearly two weeks of supposed “bereavement” (while tweeting daily), he still produced nothing of his own — until “Mel the Crazy Village Lady” released her KGB-style thread, which he promptly plagiarized, passing off its inventions as his own research.
The net effect is not toughness but fragility. By Tracey’s standard of rigor, Cooper simply could not hold the line. Faced with exposure, he failed, and revealed himself for what he is: a Cluster B mean girl in the borrowed costume of a stoic.
Absolutely perfect comment. Bravo
It’s indistinguishable from the “Stop being racist, Lee” school of argument
lol you cast yourself as an intrepid journalist, just following evidence… but yet in the face of overwhelming evidence you dig in to be a contrarian. Save your “well I was called a contrarian before and I was right then”. A broken clock is right once a day. Stop clout chasing, it’s so unbecoming.
He is a Nazi-apologist who mixes some actual facts about the WW1-WW2 period with other highly misleading and subjective quotes and outright lies etc. to try to show the Nazis as victims when in fact they were the perpetrators. And in good Nazi propagandist style, he works hard to paint the Soviet Union in as black a way as possible - rather than accepting their role in saving the world from the Nazi scourge.
His anti-Israel bent does not stem from any feeling about the Palestinians (untermensch) but just good 'ole anti-semitism. I do wonder if he is not controlled opposition to heap the stench of anti-semitism across all who question the official Epstein narrative or question the myths of WW2.
> he works hard to paint the Soviet Union in as black a way as possible
It's hard not to. Regardless of Martyr Made's views on Germany, the USSR did ally with the Nazis to get the eastern half of Poland (and the Baltic states). That enabled Hitler quite a bit, no? Then, they attacked Finland and performed poorly (possibly inspiring Hitler to underestimate Soviet military capabilities). Stalin was no boy scout and is on the level of Hitler, but only one of them lost a war so there's that. And that's just to 1940.
Stalin spent the 1930s attempting to get France and Britain to join an anti-Germany front and failed. After that, Stalin took part of Poland to move the starting point for Barbarossa much farther away from Moscow - a masterstroke that saved the Soviet Union. He never allied with Nazi Germany.
You are just repeating Nazi and Cold War propaganda, pathetic. Of course Stalin was no boy scout, he had to get the Soviet Union ready to fight the Nazis. It is laughable how much the Finns think they won their war with the Soviet Union, as with their current idiocy.
> You are just repeating Nazi and Cold War propaganda
I'm repeating the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.
Imagine defending Stalin in 2025, pathetic!
Now do Chamberlain and ‘appeasement’, idiot.
To be fair, every WW2 revisionist invariably gets smeared as a “Nazi apologist”, so that accusation rings kind of hollow at this point.
Absolutely not true, seems that you are a Cooper apologist hiding behind a trite misleading statement. Tariq Ali was never called a Nazi apologist for detailing the utter incompetence of Churchill and also his crimes.
You're not a slouch when it comes to mean girling either, I see.
But why are you a paid sub of his?
Also, the OPR report says that there was no technical obligation to notify the “victims” because the CVRA Act requires such notification only AFTER federal charges have been filed. And because the NPA prevented any federal charges from being filed, Acosta’s office did not violate the CVRA. Nevertheless, as an ETHICAL matter, the OPR said they should have been notified. But this is another nuance that people who don’t read the source documents seem to miss.
Yeah, I posted an image of that on Darryl's X thread a couple days ago at https://x.com/vrajadev/status/1961961241842487427
This whole episode and similar episodes where so many get really riled up over the objective research Michael Tracey has done has been really illuminating into the psyche of a certain type of online influencer on the right, and into the psyche of those not-so-influential who see pedophilia as a major issue among so-called "cabal" of elites. This is happening I believe because to those people the issue of pedophilia is tied up in their worldview as a central node within a larger sphere of horrible things that are being hidden by mainstream media about the ruling class. It is the reason the Q phenomena gained such credibility even though their belief in it was based on an extremely unlikely set of propositions. Why are they so quick to believe those things with such little proof, and then become so quick to denounce those who disagree with their belief system?
The idea of a cabal of elite pedophiles ruling the western world has essentially become like a religion to those people. What I mean is that a religion creates a worldview for people to anchor them in what they believe to be "reality." Which is why when people's religions are questioned by others many people get really upset with them. Because their anchor to reality is being shaken many react violently as a defense mechanism. To those whose false worldview of a cabal of pedophile elites ruling over us, that belief being shaken can be upsetting also because they have invested so much time and or money in supporting people and causes which they believe are fighting against "the cabal." Cognitive dissonance sets in and that can be especially upsetting if you have given a lot of money away based on a lie, or at least a big exaggeration, e.g., people who you believed were fighting "the cabal" and who you supported with lots of money are then exposed as either poor researchers or outright grifters knowingly conning you.
Look how they react to simple questions being raised by Michael Tracey as to the veracity of various objective facts--instead of a rational response of welcoming correction into their belief system, they attempt to destroy the credibility of Michael Tracey. This can be written off from paid influencers as Michael challenging the future of what they see as their income stream, but to those without that monetary relationship to Michael's journalism, it is reality itself that Michael is upending.
Total evisceration. I'd ask "how could Cooper possibly come back from this" but the answer is obviously that he'll just rely on his fellow grifters and idiotic audience to completely ignore it.
"Plagiarizing a fake quote is as embarrassing as it is funny." - Abraham Lincoln
This was hilarious!
“'I’m not a lawyer,' Cooper concedes. 'I apparently said that Judge Marra’s 2019 ruling invalidated the 2007 non-prosecution agreement… that wasn’t exactly right.' Hey Darryl, I’m not a lawyer either. I’m just a 'social media poster,' as you put it."
Has Michael Tracey lost his marbles? This childish bickering is CRAZY. Just take the Win Michael and leave Cooper the heck alone. You are becoming a bit obsessed and creepy. Spend a weekend at the Jersey Shore or something! Cape May is nice.
Respectfully disagree.
Michael is continuing a conversation. It would seem very strange if he failed to respond to Darryl's latest attack -- which came after Darryl promised never to contact him again -- especially considering the factual errors within that attack.
You’re ignoring the most basic rule of engagement: once the fight starts, you keep hitting the opponent until he stops moving or taps out. Cooper is a broken man now, his credibility and reputation in tatters, and never to be recovered.
If not to obtain this result, why go to war?
Haha Cooper is still 20x more popular than Tracey or Hanannanandnia
Popular sure, so is Justin Bieber so what. He’s disgraced. That’s what matters. I care not one whit for those too stupid to recognize that, regardless of their bulk.
That's because Amreekans are dumb as dirt and prefer to stay that way. Michael is way too cerebral and dogged for the Cooper Clique. Go back to your easy peasy stage show where the MAGA crowd held up the Epstein Files binders given to them that contained absolutely nothing. That was hilarious, and that's what you prefer.
Crazy Lady Mel isn’t some “random X account”….she’s (if she is indeed a women instead of a Pakistani or Iranian bot) is one of the most vile Jew hating, Holocaust deniers, Protocols of Zions quoting filth on X. So right up Darrly Cooper’s alley.
What nonsense.
She is an actual lady, who was interviewed by Glenn Greenwald on System Update a couple of weeks ago.
Not everyone who calls out Israel's slaughter of civilians is a Jew hater.
In fact she has a podcast with her lawyer partner Jenin (Previously Prohibited) which Michael was on recently, so he knows who she is.
https://rumble.com/v6wxkjk-debating-epsteins-sweetheart-deal-w-michael-tracey-previously-prohibited-ep.html
Bull💩. Check out the X feed of this absolute lunatic. Then please tell us whether she is just so concerned with the “plight poor palestians and those mean Zionists” or whether there is something else at play in her diseased mind.
I don’t have X, but Glenn Greenwald interviewed her a couple of weeks ago, and she didn’t come across as an “absolute lunatic” at all — or do you characterize everyone who objects to the Israeli slaughter of civilians the same way?
Everything is antisemitism to people like Tracey and those that come after Darryl
I'm not familiar with Michael Tracey falsely labeling anyone "antisemitic."
Cooper is probably realizing that he has been caught cutting corners in a business where that matters. Maybe some of his contrarian takes do have merit, but unfortunately if he wants to make bold assertions, he can’t be fast and loose with the facts. I thought some of the Martyr Made podcasts were interesting but his credibility has taken a self-inflicted wound by his not having “journalistic standards”, those pesky things that keep bullshit from going mainstream (when they are applied). If he is going to be in the truth-giving business, he has to have better, not worse, standards for not peddling bullshit.
You are coming off like a jilted lover. Fatal Attraction vibes. The facts are now irrelevant and the focus is shifting to your motivations here. It can't be pure truth-telling given the level of malice. You are revealing much about yourself and its not good.
It looks more like Cooper's attacks on Michael reveal a great deal of malice.
I do not follow Darryl Cooper. It is unnecessary to consider the work of a “historian” who gets the Holocaust and WWII wrong. Furthermore, anyone who follows Cooper to learn the truth about WWII or Epstein or anything else is likely a “low-info follower.” But on the Epstein story, most people are “low-info.” Who, other than journalists or someone directly involved would have the time or inclination to investigate it.
This is why a government and media that so often lie is so dangerous. If, to take one glaring example, the Hunter Biden laptop can be reported to be the product of Russian disinformation, when it obviously was not, it becomes a lot easier to believe that the opaque and disturbing allegations about Epstein are being covered up. This opens the door for the Darryl Coopers to pose as truth tellers.
Seems Cooper is beholden to vanity. End of. Not a good look for a 'serious' researcher in controversial fields. It's not so much his 'errors' that weigh against him, it's his bending of the facts to support his 'narrative' and his ad hominem manner of delivery, complete with unsavoury insinuations. These flicks of the viper, I've come to recognise, are when it is cornered. Just carry on Michael through the jungle! You're doing a great service to truth and justice.
Cooper is cringe!
W TRACEY! The people’s choice.
Meticulous, Michael. Excellent work, as usual.
The fact that this man can still have credibility with anyone after such a takedown is concerning, to say the least.
I am curious why you didn't take him to task though for his quibbling with the language of denial in the DOJ report. He claims to be no lawyer, but proceeds with a Talmudic argument distinguishing "told" (daily beast hearsay) from "having knowledge of" (DOJ under oath), purporting the denial of the latter to be of less consequence because knowledge requires a high threshold.
I'm not a lawyer, by any means, but that seems like a pretty weasely justification around his insistence around an intelligence connection. Thoughts?
Oh wow you forgot to mention antisemitism, thats crazy of you man. Get a life dude
Long winded bag of shit, Michael still hasn’t responded to my post. This is the fourth time I’ve posted this. Defending the honor of pedophiles while demanding the attention of journalists is the end of Tracy’s career and possibly his sanity. When you find a bridge to live under be sure to share your stupidity. You can beg for subscribers there too.
Why do you appear to be defending the honor of a man who plead guilty to pedophilia, in spite of his legion of amazing defense attorneys?
Was serial fabulist Virginia Giuffre a horrible lying whore? If so, one would think his defense team would have blown her to pieces. Instead, according to recent stuttering defense of Epstein on your pod cast with Thad Russell, you assert she was awarded between 10 -30 million dollars. How do you explain that? Is she a whore or a criminal mastermind? A Robin Hood for sluts! She took Dershowitz’s most famous client down, but couldn’t take a dime from Dershowitz?
Then in the same rambling pig of an interview, you got mixed up about “which” 14 year old girl you were smearing. So now we know that there were at least two 14 year old girls doing god knows what with a guy who recruits girls from high schools. But to suggest that he didn’t know their ages? The problem isn’t that he didn’t know. The recruiting girls from high schools would be the thing that triggered alarm bells. Also, you defending or parsing the crime seems creepy as fuck. If I were casting a creepy pedo for a movie, your physical appearance would make you a natural candidate.
You asking for a definition of “Epstein space” is childish and inconsistent with “polite E-mail”. You will recoil and feign indignation at my assessment. Because you pretend to be autistic and lacking in social awareness. Which is why I will never write you a “polite” anything. But while we’re on the subject, where have you been with your mad journo skills for the last 20 years pertaining to this story.
When “you think about it for five minutes, because Acosta in fact did not leave Epstein alone”? In the first 5 seconds I’m wondering why the fuck the feds were even involved? Additionally, I’m wondering “why the light sentence” and what the fuck did he “actually” do if that is what he plead to with Dershowitz as his attorney. How would you possibly know the extent of their efforts to thwart Acosta or their sincerity? Maybe they knew they were going to get off easy at sentencing. Maybe the proceedings were intended to pacify locals in the community who were asking too many questions and the feds were afraid of disclosure at a hearing.
You whine like a broken record about how the women involved got so much money for being sluts. But cling to Guiffre like a life preserver because if you get too far down the road of credibility the numbers are overwhelming. Both in girls/women and settlement dollars.
Why bring up Podesta? The FBI wants the Seth Rich laptop sealed forever. The pizza gate reference seems like you’re trying to defame cooper broadly instead of staying with the topic at hand. Like if I inserted something about your beheaded babies lies.
Tracey concerning Acosta calling Epstein an intelligence asset:
“Acosta replied under penalty of perjury, “The answer is no.”
Hey retard! Politicians and government officials lie under oath all the time. That’s sort of the whole Epstein thing. Lying, obfuscations, way too many questions and very ridiculous answers.
The suicide. The broken cameras and “lazy” guards. The release of dubious footage 5 years later. The odd autopsy protocol.
The shear number of girls and the money they received when a super sleuth like Micheal Tracey could have sent those scandalous whores packing. Which is really odd given his superstar defense attorneys.
Dershowitz introduction to Epstein through lady Rothschild. Bill Barrs daddy hiring him at his school without a teaching certificate. Maxwells daddy’s intelligence and media ties. His mysterious death. A virtual who’s who of powerful turds wrapped around the axels of this bullshit. And don’t forget the weird stuff at his home. Including a first edition of “Lolita”. Which you conveniently left out of your article when you referenced the “Lolita Express”. Wasn’t that the kind of omission you were whining about?
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/jeffrey-epstein-manhattan-house-interior-b2802203.html
In case your garbage isn’t gross enough, there’s a real jealousy thread about the girls. Is it because they have lots of money by virtue of tricking filthy rich motherfuckers and their incompetent attorneys? Face it. You’re a shitty journalist, and you will always be broke. That’s not the fault of either of the 14 year old girls you mixed up. Or anyone else. Maybe find another profession.
Why would he respond to your garbage? He is a journalist doing his job of questioning "facts" stated by someone who puts himself forward as a "truth teller". You are simply attempting to smear someone because he is pointing holes in Cooper's statements. Maybe you should just STFU with your very obvious attempt to shoot the messenger.
Great question. Why would actual journalists be interested in debating a blow hard ass hole who spent a month criticizing a dead woman while ignoring the totality of the evidence. Tracey and mouth breathers like you think you’re owed an explanation. You’re really not owed a fucking thing. Especially when Tracey was completely exposed as a Zionist tool concerning dead babies. He’s doing it again by purporting that all the Israel connections can be ignored because Virginia Giuffre was a crazy whore. You should stfu. But you seem intent on defending a predator or protecting intelligence extortion. Keep running your cunt mouth. Fans of Tracey and his work should be identified as child molester advocates. Thanks
You and cooper are 2 peas in a pod. In lieu of providing actual substantive evidence to back up what you’ve saying you start screeching like the drama queens you are. It’s really very funny to observe.
Why should Michael respond to you? All you do is come out here and insult him. And if he were to view your Substack like I did this morning, he would find that all you do is attack him there when you’re not obsessing over Israel.
How is he defending the honor of Epstein? All he is doing is pointing out the grand narratives about Epstein being the ring leader of some international Cabal of pedos lacks a lot of credible evidence. What was it that Carl Sagan used to say? Extraordinary claims require extra extraordinary evidence.
As far as Giuffre, have you not seen what her own lawyers wrote that she “” fictionalized”(their words) most of her trafficking stories in her unpublished memoir? Or that if she was such an ace in the hole witness, why didn’t the Feds calls her up when they prosecuted Maxwell?
The reason Michael zeros in on Giuffre is because she’s the linchpin to the story being greater than it is. Without Giuffre, Epstein is nothing more than a wealthy pervert that prays on teenagers, with Giuffre, it becomes a sinister conspiracy theory.
It’s so funny. The only reason Michael engages with the Whitney Webbs, Nick Bryant’s and Darryl Cooper’s it’s because of his critics. Then he takes a journalistic Occam’s razor to their work and then gets criticized again. Michael can’t win for lose with you guys. If he doesn’t address their work, he’s accused of cherry picking his targets, but if he does engage with their work, then suddenly he’s a horrible monster for daring to not genuflect before the alter of the Great Sage of Idaho or Her Majesty Whitney Webb
The reason he zeros in on Giuffre is because she’s damaged. Not to mention, incapable of defending herself. Tracey claims that she has received 10 to 30 million dollars. 150 other women have received millions. Why constantly bemoan Giuffre? Why constantly parse the 2007 NPA in the most Epstein favorable way? He plead guilty to sex with a minor. With the most kick ass attorneys available. But somehow, in your feeble mind, if Giuffre is garbage, everything else is somehow conspiracy?
Robert Maxwell was a media mogul who had intelligence ties.
A who’s who of scumbags interacted with Epstein.
A parade of Israeli prime ministers visited his home.
Epstein’s murder/suicide/disappearance is shrouded in super unhelpful coincidences.
Those who participated in these activities have a vested interest in creating doubt centered on a dead girl. Which is particularly curious given the fact that the crazy dead girl is on the verge of releasing a new book.
It’s also curious no one thought to sue or criticize Webb until now concerning her sourcing or accusations. This party has been going on for a long while. Where was fat fuck for the last nearly 20 years?
You mean the very book her own lawyers admitted in court was highly ‘fictionalized’ ? I am sure Clinton, Noam Chomsky, Lex Wexner and others were shaking in their boots at the thought of a novel coming out
Ok. Stipulated. Then why did rich people bury these victims in money? If she is completely broken and a horrible witness, fair enough. What about the other 150 “victims “? Frankly, I feel as if the victims were made whole. It’s the blackmail that ensued that should be prosecuted. The idea that no one has the video is bullshit. Using government documents to prove that there is no crime, in 2025 is absurd. Whatever the government or MSM says the loudest, start looking for lies and propaganda
Speaking of long winded bags of shit…
“Long winded bag of shit”
Your projection is absolutely fascinating.
Because you are worthless trash. That’s all you’ll ever be.