And I thought with Thomas Massie, Marjorie Greene and Nancy Mace losing their offices things would quiet down on the Epstein front. But the idiocy continues, unabated.
Elaborate when you are talking more about this subject, please elucidate 5),8)‘more lol clearly think you are expecting acknowledgement and a thank you for my appreciation of all commentators here to be informed and have objective writing capability - I thank you.
Are we to understand that Epstein’s counsel and accountant are to be prosecuted on the basis of accusations made by anonymous witnesses/victims whose names will not be divulged and who will not be subject to cross examination in a public court? Is that where this is all heading?
You've got to get in front of a mic on the big stage, Michael. This issue isn't dying anytime soon and all our politicians and media figures are sanctimonious cowards.
Ideally, but I doubt that's the way it would play out, unless the idea was to make Michael Tracey look the odd bumbling idiot out - just as what happened to him when he went on that piece of shit Piers Morgan's program.
yeah but I feel that’s what would happen on most platforms. In front of Congress though you reach more people who can actually do things and force a discussion/argument in real time.
Well, Yes I hadn't considered that. I don't think that it would make any difference though, however, he would reach a public audience that would be aware of him as someone with a totally objective and informed opinion and one that would at least encourage others to do the same. It would be a great if that happened, but I don't think Congress would have him on - for he might expose some of their shortcomings(perhaps, at least that's what their afraid of).
It finally struck me how old all this is when I realized it started in 1994, 7 years before 911. It was a different era and these trafficking laws didn't exist, at least not in their current insane form. As I understand it, if say, an accountant had a client who routinely asked the accountant to wire money to a casino in Vegas for a gambling weekend and the client came back saying he had met an adult woman whom he had hooked up with and liked and told her he would try to introduce her to influential contacts to advance her career, the accountant would not think another thing about it. Then 30 years later, the woman comes forward saying the client never did introduce her to anyone worthwhile and therefore she was adult sex-trafficked because she was induced by a thing of value. The client is long dead. And now the accountant is being investigated for a sex trafficking felony for participating in the "scheme" by handling the wires to and from Vegas?
Tell Ryan’s father that I apologize for not making in to his son’s wedding due to moral injury from serving in the military. It is a very small world. I try to move forward when seeing a face I encountered during my days as an alcoholic. There is nothing Ryan did - I was happy to see him at the office. As you looked into my situation there, do you not find it a bit absurd, knowing my background?
Thanks for letting me move on. I thought to return to invite you for a beer but decided it was not good optics due to recent trespassing allegations from a particular business with an incompetent front desk female “manager”.
I was happy to charge my telephone at McDonalds and caught a Delta Airlines flight out of Racine, Wisconsin three days later - after spending some time sleeping on a church bench out in the elements for safety.
If you live a good life, then you have nothing to fret over. If you begin to make judgements based in ignorance; I believe and say that such ignorance should be eliminated from the conjecture.
As your Leon’s dad Nigel had asked, is it “creative curiosity” or “curiosity of children”? That is an answer you may be able to find in Rudolf Steiner’s work if you study it with reverence. This is not an answer for others to give to you. It is an answer you must receive from yourself.
I recommend reading every single book on http://www.rudolfsteineraudio.com for that answer - those serious in study who care about children other than their own. However, it is only for me to recommend the Fifth Gospel on http://www.rsarchive.org (search: Fifth Gospel)
Here is what I tell you to do:
do not donate any money to this organization. My cousin has already donated more than $111 dollars to http://rsarchive.org and it is more than enough to sustain it into the future. If you want to give money, I highly suggest that you direct it towards the alleged victims - they deserve the awards denied them by our legal body!
Relax. Everything is okay! Nobodies are harmed.
Take care in your thoughts and your lives, all. Thank you to my aunt Mary - a noble deed. Thank you to my uncle Ronald - knowing what to do towards the end! And thank you to the others who spoke today in a closed session on the business nature of these events. Such a mature discussion is merited.
There's an estate to pillage for all these bottom feeders. I keep thinking the women/girls are just a distraction to the real crimes of insider trading, tax evasion, money laundering and black market weapons sales, which may very well implicate JP, BoA, Leon Black, Bill Gates et al.
You obviously follow this issue at a great deal of depth compared to me, but for what its worth, I wasn't too surprised with this development either. I have always viewed the Epstein issue as having a natural appeal to the Republican party, given their willingness to embrace conspiracy theories, and more specifically, given the affinity of this issue to QAnon. E.g., I wasn't surprised at all when JD Vance stated his belief in Epstein conspiracies. In fact, it seemed like a politically smart move.
Given all the recent civil litigation, it will be really valuable if you can summarize the main takeaways in some future post, even just the factual summary. What did we learn from them, if anything? Is there any credible allegation of crimes committed by Epstein post-2009 at this point?
I find it difficult to believe that $243 million dropped into the USVI coffers with no transparency nor oversight and some untoward or at least entertaining things are not being done with that money.
And I thought with Thomas Massie, Marjorie Greene and Nancy Mace losing their offices things would quiet down on the Epstein front. But the idiocy continues, unabated.
Elaborate when you are talking more about this subject, please elucidate 5),8)‘more lol clearly think you are expecting acknowledgement and a thank you for my appreciation of all commentators here to be informed and have objective writing capability - I thank you.
Are we to understand that Epstein’s counsel and accountant are to be prosecuted on the basis of accusations made by anonymous witnesses/victims whose names will not be divulged and who will not be subject to cross examination in a public court? Is that where this is all heading?
Elaborate when you are talking more about this subject, please elucidate 5),8)‘more lol clearly
Do you have an answer to my question?
You've got to get in front of a mic on the big stage, Michael. This issue isn't dying anytime soon and all our politicians and media figures are sanctimonious cowards.
Ideally, but I doubt that's the way it would play out, unless the idea was to make Michael Tracey look the odd bumbling idiot out - just as what happened to him when he went on that piece of shit Piers Morgan's program.
yeah but I feel that’s what would happen on most platforms. In front of Congress though you reach more people who can actually do things and force a discussion/argument in real time.
Well, Yes I hadn't considered that. I don't think that it would make any difference though, however, he would reach a public audience that would be aware of him as someone with a totally objective and informed opinion and one that would at least encourage others to do the same. It would be a great if that happened, but I don't think Congress would have him on - for he might expose some of their shortcomings(perhaps, at least that's what their afraid of).
Elaborate when you are talking more about this subject, please elucidate 5),8)‘more lol clearly thank you are covering this good job
It finally struck me how old all this is when I realized it started in 1994, 7 years before 911. It was a different era and these trafficking laws didn't exist, at least not in their current insane form. As I understand it, if say, an accountant had a client who routinely asked the accountant to wire money to a casino in Vegas for a gambling weekend and the client came back saying he had met an adult woman whom he had hooked up with and liked and told her he would try to introduce her to influential contacts to advance her career, the accountant would not think another thing about it. Then 30 years later, the woman comes forward saying the client never did introduce her to anyone worthwhile and therefore she was adult sex-trafficked because she was induced by a thing of value. The client is long dead. And now the accountant is being investigated for a sex trafficking felony for participating in the "scheme" by handling the wires to and from Vegas?
btw MT, you seem to have mixed up the WSJ article link with something else.
Fixed, thanks
It has been removed from google after sending it to the cia
You share a name with someone I knew in high school/college it startled the heck outta me
Interesting, perhaps he should change his name to Robert Colucci.
Tell Ryan’s father that I apologize for not making in to his son’s wedding due to moral injury from serving in the military. It is a very small world. I try to move forward when seeing a face I encountered during my days as an alcoholic. There is nothing Ryan did - I was happy to see him at the office. As you looked into my situation there, do you not find it a bit absurd, knowing my background?
Thanks for letting me move on. I thought to return to invite you for a beer but decided it was not good optics due to recent trespassing allegations from a particular business with an incompetent front desk female “manager”.
I was happy to charge my telephone at McDonalds and caught a Delta Airlines flight out of Racine, Wisconsin three days later - after spending some time sleeping on a church bench out in the elements for safety.
If you live a good life, then you have nothing to fret over. If you begin to make judgements based in ignorance; I believe and say that such ignorance should be eliminated from the conjecture.
As your Leon’s dad Nigel had asked, is it “creative curiosity” or “curiosity of children”? That is an answer you may be able to find in Rudolf Steiner’s work if you study it with reverence. This is not an answer for others to give to you. It is an answer you must receive from yourself.
I recommend reading every single book on http://www.rudolfsteineraudio.com for that answer - those serious in study who care about children other than their own. However, it is only for me to recommend the Fifth Gospel on http://www.rsarchive.org (search: Fifth Gospel)
Here is what I tell you to do:
do not donate any money to this organization. My cousin has already donated more than $111 dollars to http://rsarchive.org and it is more than enough to sustain it into the future. If you want to give money, I highly suggest that you direct it towards the alleged victims - they deserve the awards denied them by our legal body!
Relax. Everything is okay! Nobodies are harmed.
Take care in your thoughts and your lives, all. Thank you to my aunt Mary - a noble deed. Thank you to my uncle Ronald - knowing what to do towards the end! And thank you to the others who spoke today in a closed session on the business nature of these events. Such a mature discussion is merited.
With cautionary hesitance and uncertainty,
JB
Does the intelligence community have a problem with racism? The answer was yes. For me, it is still yes. Chris, fuck off tty in ten years.
There's an estate to pillage for all these bottom feeders. I keep thinking the women/girls are just a distraction to the real crimes of insider trading, tax evasion, money laundering and black market weapons sales, which may very well implicate JP, BoA, Leon Black, Bill Gates et al.
You obviously follow this issue at a great deal of depth compared to me, but for what its worth, I wasn't too surprised with this development either. I have always viewed the Epstein issue as having a natural appeal to the Republican party, given their willingness to embrace conspiracy theories, and more specifically, given the affinity of this issue to QAnon. E.g., I wasn't surprised at all when JD Vance stated his belief in Epstein conspiracies. In fact, it seemed like a politically smart move.
Given all the recent civil litigation, it will be really valuable if you can summarize the main takeaways in some future post, even just the factual summary. What did we learn from them, if anything? Is there any credible allegation of crimes committed by Epstein post-2009 at this point?
I find it difficult to believe that $243 million dropped into the USVI coffers with no transparency nor oversight and some untoward or at least entertaining things are not being done with that money.
One wonders, would the Linday Clancy jury convict “… Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, Harry Beller and other Epstein aides”?
Or would they vote to acquit because the prosecution failed to show compassion to the accused?
What about this? Michael Trace?
https://youtube.com/shorts/95fEF6NA09I?is=YyNIXqbEISTJrBYd