If you watch enough brain-warped TV ads and “debate” theatrics, it’s not hard to detect the talking points that have been cannily crafted for both Democrats and Republicans with respect to Jeffrey Epstein, the beloved deceased financier, whose life and times have strangely become the central thematic through-line in our exciting national referendum: call it the Great Pedo Election of 2026.
I thought when the disc next to the name was colored (as Z. de Chauncey’s is) it meant a paid subscriber. But now I notice that the little floret in the disc can have varying numbers of petals (I’ve seen 4, 5, and 7). Is there a key to these substack symbols somewhere?
Jeff has surely served at least one intelligence agency more than we will ever know, but credibly speculate about. I see everything else as distraction and speculation of a highly pecuniary nature.
I didn't vote, and I would feel dirty if I ever did again, but I'm proud to be your supporter. Cheers to you, sir.
A "supporter" who doesn't pay the $5? With "supporters" like these...
I thought when the disc next to the name was colored (as Z. de Chauncey’s is) it meant a paid subscriber. But now I notice that the little floret in the disc can have varying numbers of petals (I’ve seen 4, 5, and 7). Is there a key to these substack symbols somewhere?
I didn’t know this was going on; I haven’t seen the ads, and Epstein isn’t being talked about much in the media I see.
The Republicans could have leaned into not being accused of complicity in raping 13-year-olds and younger.
Jeff has surely served at least one intelligence agency more than we will ever know, but credibly speculate about. I see everything else as distraction and speculation of a highly pecuniary nature.
This can only be understood as epistemic collapse; terms like beyond misinformation don't suffice.
Brilliant expose. Kudos to you for taking truth telling seriously.