14 Comments
User's avatar
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Completely agree! The fact he clearly doesn’t believe in actual innocent until proven guilty means he should be no where near government.

Dead Cleopatra's avatar

So who is paying you to defend the Epstein class?

Pilgrim's avatar

You would have to pay me half your 7k shekels to read this GARBAGE

N Martin's avatar

I agree. His behavior on the Epstein matter has been revolting. He's a man of no integrity.

Michael Meo's avatar

In your very first sentence, Mr Tracey, you say it's hard to imagine something more disqualifying for public office than accusing innocent parties of crimes without evidence.

Forgive me, but you lack perspective. Engaging in war, in genocide, in extermination of a people, is of considerably more heinous weight than accusing some innocent party of sex crimes.

That comparison is indicative of your lack of any balance.

I'm not accusing Mr Gallrein of genocide, but it's a fact that genocidaires are funding his campaign, and it is a fact that Massie stands for standing down from our Endless War.

You don't do balance or nuance -- you do puncture wounds.

Michael Haag's avatar

A skillful exposition of the fact that no one is fit to rule. I very much appreciate that you’re too honest (and cantankerous) to advocate for the least-bad tyrant.

Quint's avatar

I hope Massie goes down tomorrow. His pathetic and uneducated cheerleading for the Epstein witch hunt chronicles are reason enough to end up in the dumpster fire of history. All he had to do was read Michael Tracey's work. He sold out to Pizzagate redux and the fake moral limelight of a Me Too grab. Adios.

Andrew Murphy's avatar

Don’t forget he also was heroic in opposing Trump’s lockdowns and the Economic Injury Disaster Loans and Paycheck Protection programs which only shows Trump’s opposition now shows it is about the war. Trump had no problem with him bucking MAGA in 2020 but now suddenly he is problematic

Jennifer Jones's avatar

I agree Trump was wrong for the lockdowns and how the “stimulus checks” were handled. However by late summer early fall he was leaving it up to the states and began calling out states that remained closed. In the very beginning it was on him, first few months, but after that it was on the democrats and they went into overdrive including forced vaccinations and 2 rounds of stimulus handouts. Giving individual tax payers their money back IMO wasn’t wrong but it was handled wrong & many of the handouts were unwarranted. It should have been taken from one of the many wasteful entities and not increase the debt.

Gary Grass's avatar

Regardless of anything else, I always disdain the framing of this or that politician deserves to win or lose. Doesn’t our politics serve some purpose other than handing out rewards and punishments to its participants? There should be room to say, yes, you’re a great person and deserve a win, but I just can’t inflict your policies on my worst enemy. Or, jeez you are scum, but sadly we need you.

N Martin's avatar

If you don't think making unsupported allegations of sexual misconduct are disqualifying then you are a moral problem.

Gary Grass's avatar

Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with what I just said.

N Martin's avatar

Sorry to not connect with your ramble, but I'm on topic.

Gary Grass's avatar

You’re on your topic. If you came back just to insult me then, respectfully, you can just fuck the hell off.