The always intelligent and well-informed people of the internet have recently started clamoring for me to address a scandalizing new incident: an Israeli government official, it is said, was arrested in Nevada for child-sex crimes, and then, shockingly, allowed to flee the United States and return to Israel.
I thought the issue was allowing an arrested person to keep their passport and leave, not only the local jurisdiction, but the US, as well. This doesn't look like standard operating procedure. It would be good to address this aspect. Adjudicating the merits comes later, and would seem irrelevant to this flight issue. Did any of the others caught up in this operation leave the country?
Thank you Joy. Everybody with the brain knows that if they were caught up in this mess, they would not be free to leave the country. The details almost don't matter.
That raven thing is a virulent jooo-hater. I remember him from before October 7 - all in on all the joooo-conspiracy stuff. Don't bother, unless you feel like taking a shit (on him).
You subscribe to Scott Ritter, Caitlin Johnston, and other conspiracists and grifters. Your brain is likely conspiracy-addled. "The details almost don't matter."
Let's see now how many fallacies have you engaged in in this one comment? The first one is fallacy by association, where you judge my argument based on my associations. Flag on the play, you have violated one of the benchmarks of what it means to be an intellectual. The second fallacy is engaging in name calling, that my brain is conspiracy addled. That's the fallacy of the person where you are redirecting the conversation away from the subject and on to the person. That is a violation of the logical fallacy and shows that you have no game. Then you engage in name calling of people that I subscribe to, which again has nothing to do with the substance of my argument and is just more logical fallacies which again shows that you have no game. if you want to challenge me based on a specific subject, then challenge me with intellect and within the rules of logic, rather than the emotional expressions of someone who has absolutely no idea they even have a subconscious. That's not a fallacious attack on your personality, that's an observation, you speak from emotion rather than intellect.
Even your week pathetic effort at attacking my person is completely lame and illogical. I'm complaining about the release of a charged individual for crimes against a child and you turn around and call me a pedophile fan. And then, through some miracle of thought, you link me to a foreign government. What are you, 14? That's not an attack on your person it's a reasonable question based on the level of your thought processes. I used to be a school teacher so I'm very aware of adolescent thinking.
Because they think they have a special god, a special book, and special rights to real estate that entitles them to torture and murder anyone who gets in the way. Israel uses US foreign aid to lobby/buy the US Congress, which then further fuels its sense of entitlement. That's not conspiracy, it's math.
A foreign national charged in the United States with a major crime normally has their passport confiscated as part of the bail proceeding. Foreign Nationals are considered a high flight risk. Your friend the pedophile got special treatment. Are you a member of a pro pedophile organization that's going around defending your members?
Okay Edward it looks like you may be posting a little late at night, which may explain why your words are confusing. What is "Cias" and since I don't know what the word means exactly, how is my comment associated with it?
Normally, when an intelligence-linked official from a close U.S. ally gets into legal trouble here, the arrest is either kept quiet, charges are downgraded, or the whole thing is handled administratively behind the scenes. That’s how the U.S. and its allies usually protect each other’s operatives — no public spectacle, no headlines. In fact, the standard play is to avoid embarrassment at all costs.
But in Alexandrovich’s case, the opposite happened: his name, government position, and ties to Israel’s National Cyber Directorate were splashed across local Vegas media and then global outlets almost immediately. That’s not how you treat someone you’re trying to shield. If this was really about “special treatment,” the simplest way to protect him would’ve been to keep the arrest under wraps.
So the fact that it was so highly publicized actually contradicts the popular claim that he got off easy because “Israel controls the U.S.” If anything, the exposure itself was humiliating for Israel and suggests either a bureaucratic slip — local cops moving ahead before Washington realized who they had — or a deliberate choice to put the story out there as leverage.
I think this is an important wrinkle: the publicity undermines the notion that he was secretly protected, and points instead to either incompetence or a calculated embarrassment.
Fallacy by association. Didn't you go to school? If you believe I'm misinformed by a false statement made by Scott ritter, then you are obligated to cite that with chapter and verse. But you don't because you can't. People like you are driven by unconscious emotions, that's why you don't think because you're just feeling.
Nothing was said about revoking a passport, but local police can, and often do, request the arrested to turn in their passport, and to not leave the jurisdiction. I guess I can ask you the same question.
So poor, lonely Tom couldn’t find a hooker in Vegas? He had to go online? Was every man who went online at this website arrested? I don’t think so. If this website was so legit why was it being monitored for a sting operation?
I doubt a full transcript of what was said has been released.
Responding to alleged outrage is adorable. You picked a conspicuously easy target to critique. Why not address the way Epstein met Dershowitz? Not conducive to your absolution of Epstein and Israel?
Isn’t there some way you can blame Giuffre for this too? I don’t know why you think you need to appease or refute the internet bandwagon. You could do journalism. Like a journalist. And let the chips fall where they may. Prefacing your story as a public service is on brand for you.
Underselling it a bit aren’t we? He said that Clinton and numerous others met Epstein through this Rothschild. Not just any random Jew. Kinda the epicenter of conspiracy don’t you think? Weird that I’ve been following this saga for years and never heard anything about that. And infinitely more interesting than random nobody trying to leave the country to avoid pedo charges.
Sure, I think you encapsulated it correctly: "Kinda the epicenter of conspiracy don't you thing?" Conspiracy of what?
- Lynn Forester de Rothschild married into the family, she is not a Rothschild by birth. Does this mean she is NOT up to crazy shit. No, but just yelling "Oh look, a Rothschild" is called guilt by association.
- Forester de Rothschild was a big time political donor to the Clintons and other Democratic politicians until Obama. Then she switched to supporting Republicans including McCain, Romney, and John Huntsman. Does this mean that all three of those were compromised by Jeffrey Epstein? If you're answer is "yes", please explain. Don't just say something like "connect the dots".
In short, any association with a well-known person like a member of the Rothschilds is indeed conspicuous, but please explain why it is more than just that.
All you have to write Rothschild and the ‘Jewish bankers run the world’ will start coming out of the woodwork. Is like saying Trump in a crowd of blue hair progressives
I really cannot see how these types of operations are not considered entrapment. It seems to me that the only reason law enforcement get away with it is because of the subject matter.
Actually, in this case as described, it wasn't even entrapment as there was no evidence.
My next door neighbor was correctly caught by an operation similar to this. Correctly in that he was specifically looking for significantly underage girls on the internet to have sex with and after a police woman posing as a girl told him she was fifteen he asked her to meet him. And they met in a hotel room etc etc.
He was 50 and his wife was devastated.
In my neighbor's case it wasn't entrapment, apparently he had been doing this for a while.
I’ve read the details of probable cause and declaration for arrest which in most jurisdictions means the investigating officer is stating facts under penalty of perjury. In the declaration, the detective doesn’t go into great specifics about the online conversation between Tom Alexdrovich and the decoy other than to say they made arrangements to meet somewhere and Alexdrovich agreed to bring a condom. The task force recorded the online conversation and the declaration states the decoy was “acting as a 15 year old female.” I’d be flabbergasted if the decoy didn’t make some reference to her purported age.
Pure’s terms of service are not going to a defense to this charge. Lots of dudes have tried to fight statutory rape charges on the grounds that they met someone in 21 & up bar. Doesn’t work.
By posting the 10k bail, Alexdrovich waived a probable cause hearing. Had Alexdrovich stayed incarcerated in Nevada, the investigating officer might have been forced to put forward some evidence that Alexdrovich knew this girl was underage.
Thanks for the clarification. I puzzled about two things here: can the police be so incompetent as to not have clearly indicated that she was under age. And on the flip side, I can't figure out why Michael Tracey wouldn't also be hip to what you describe.
A .pdf of the probable cause document I’m talking about is up on “Breaking Points” Locals channel. I assume Michael Tracy could post a copy here. There is enough to establish probable cause, but a prosecutor will need to produce more evidence to secure a conviction at trial. Again, the detective states the police recorded the online interaction between Alexdrovich & the decoy.
The question is whether this dude is going to show up at his trial.
Isn’t the lack of specifics reason to be suspicious? If the person clearly said “I AM A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL,” wouldn’t you put that in the affidavit?
Well that’s why you have trials where the government is obligated to provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Probably 95% of the affidavit prior to the narrative concerning Alexdrovich’s interview is cut & paste.
180 degree disagree. Police put out bait cars to catch auto burglars & car thieves. I wish they would do the same with bait bicycles. If the decoy makes it clear to the dude online she’s underage, (hell if she even hints at it) the dude should end any sex talk with her immediately.
Alexdrovich took action to meet this decoy in the physical world. I got zero problems prosecuting folks who chat up people and try to arrange sex with when they know or should know the person is underage.
In any case, we agree that if the bait person said he/she/it was underage, then sex talk or meeting for sex is a crime.
We know he was using an app for people over 18 that does age verification. We don’t know precisely what was said by the bait person, and that is the critical fact.
Don't deny the existence of pedo nor the media propensity to create division so people can hate the Jews instead of the rich people raping kids and your wallet.
It is entrampment, and they are more political than anything else. In order for there to be a crime, the subject has to have actually committed a crime. That's one of the problems with the modern judicial system.
It would be fantastic, no more forever wars, we could bring all our soldiers home and shrink the military by 90%. We could also strip the Jew banks and Jew landlords of their assets they got not through any kind of work, but from having inherited money in the first place. The peace divided, and stolen Jew assets dividends alone would tens of thousands of dollars for every man, woman, and child. Not to mention to end of porn and queer and other woke bullshit being shoved down our throats, no AIPAC buying our politicians, no more hate on people for being born white. It would be paradise on Earth.
He should not have been allowed to leave the country. A judge should have noticed, given Israel's past history of failing to cooperate with extradition requests in this exact type of case, that this guy was a flight risk.
And the US attorney, a person with a lot of power and responsibility in this case, a person whose job is to represent America and American interests, should've asked a judge to take the guy's passport. But, strangely, the US attorney did not do that. Oh, and also strangely, the US attorney was born in Israel and has dual citizenship.
And Michael Tracey's response is "Nothing to see here, folks."
If this had occurred in a vacuum, your "argument" might stand, but as Greyzone and others have exposed, "israel" is a paedo haven, both for Jewish foreigners fleeing persecution as well as homegrown crimes. The rape culture in "israel" is also well known, and attested to by myriad IOF abuses of the investigative process of female IOF victims as well as Palestinian detainees. What else should we expect of a nation that seriously argues that sexual torture by the state should not be prosecuted. How many passages of the Talmud clearly give consent and approval for the sexual assault of "goyim"?
None. The answer to your last question is none. You can drag up a couple frequently misrepresented quotes that are full on lies, otherwise you have nothing there.
Tons of these high profile cases do end up getting extradited like Leifer and extradition loopholes closed.
You sound like a real genius though so I’m going to assume you’re right so no need to respond.
Hey genius, I said no need to respond. You’ve got it all figured out. Antisemitic conspiracy theorists have always had it right, that’s why they have 2000 years of nonsensical whining with nothing to show for it. But Leifer, kranczer, Karow, and Roemer just to start. I’m starting to think you lot ARE actually inferior to those wily sex perverts.
Stop bloviating and deflecting and answer the question at hand. By all accounts, "israel" is paedo/rapist shangri-la, which you would refute..if you re able? Still, we wait..
Telling people "don't reply" in no way advances your assertions as valid, in fact, it's cowardly, and typical of a zionist reply.
Why are you and your commenters so befuddled by the concept of a sting operation? Have you never watched Chris Hansen? Sting operations aren’t entrapment so long as you don’t coerce the person into doing things they wouldn’t otherwise do. These cases almost always result in the person being found guilty.
Okay but should we be assuming the FBI charged this guy without the decoy claiming to be underage?! That's a pretty big blunder. Maybe it happened but its pretty unlikely. This article is disturbing. MT seems to be more concerned with offering up unlikely excuses for the crime and even suggesting that trapping sexual predators is a waste of tax payers money.
Ritter got caught at least three times, knowingly going for 14 and 15 year olds. He masturbated on cam, unprompted, for at least one of them - in 2009. He was an early adopter of that technology.
I like the way you approach it. If there is no evidence that he thought the girl was underage, there is no case, since the entrapment officer was clearly of age. If she let slip during the conversation a subtle reference to being underage, they would have to prove he picked up on it. In any case, it's clearly entrapment since there is no evidence whatsoever he would have been involved in any way with underaged girls had it not been for law "enforcement" efforts.
"if only to demonstrate that I’m not suspiciously reluctant to address whatever information people think proves me wrong"
I'll read the rest of your essay during the day. But don't go down this road, of trying to prove things to people. Stay anchored to reporting events and engaging in objective analysis.
Earlier I asked Ryan Grim in his comments section if any attempt was made to find out how Alexandrovich returned to Israel. Mr. Grim did not respond. Would you happen to know?
Did Alexandrovich return to Israel via chartered flight or commercial airlines? If he had been considered to be fleeing on August 6, there should’ve been at least one chance to intercept him before he left U.S. airspace. He almost certainly would’ve had to land in between Vegas-to-East Coast and East Coast-to-Transatlantic. So there must be either an FAA flight log or passenger record, yes? Also, the other individuals arrested were allowed to post bond, yes? Alexandrovich is due back in court next Wednesday (8/27), yes? So at this point, this really isn’t even an international incident yet, no?
We don’t gotta be unbiased. But we do gotta be fair.
Not just that, but it's completely tone deaf to suggest that because there was no real victim there was no crime. A real 15 year old could have showed up in that uber. It was more than fantasy or role play.
I thought the issue was allowing an arrested person to keep their passport and leave, not only the local jurisdiction, but the US, as well. This doesn't look like standard operating procedure. It would be good to address this aspect. Adjudicating the merits comes later, and would seem irrelevant to this flight issue. Did any of the others caught up in this operation leave the country?
Thank you Joy. Everybody with the brain knows that if they were caught up in this mess, they would not be free to leave the country. The details almost don't matter.
Mr Tracey has some answering to do for this article that never addressed the real issue.
He has sold out to evil, it’s really that simple.
Pathetic, hope you get out of your mother's basement.
That raven thing is a virulent jooo-hater. I remember him from before October 7 - all in on all the joooo-conspiracy stuff. Don't bother, unless you feel like taking a shit (on him).
I am a 59 year old man who owns his own home outright. And you, wage/debt slave for Jews a lot?
Do you like little boys?!
Really? Did your mother smoke crack while pregnant with you?
You subscribe to Scott Ritter, Caitlin Johnston, and other conspiracists and grifters. Your brain is likely conspiracy-addled. "The details almost don't matter."
Let's see now how many fallacies have you engaged in in this one comment? The first one is fallacy by association, where you judge my argument based on my associations. Flag on the play, you have violated one of the benchmarks of what it means to be an intellectual. The second fallacy is engaging in name calling, that my brain is conspiracy addled. That's the fallacy of the person where you are redirecting the conversation away from the subject and on to the person. That is a violation of the logical fallacy and shows that you have no game. Then you engage in name calling of people that I subscribe to, which again has nothing to do with the substance of my argument and is just more logical fallacies which again shows that you have no game. if you want to challenge me based on a specific subject, then challenge me with intellect and within the rules of logic, rather than the emotional expressions of someone who has absolutely no idea they even have a subconscious. That's not a fallacious attack on your personality, that's an observation, you speak from emotion rather than intellect.
Even your week pathetic effort at attacking my person is completely lame and illogical. I'm complaining about the release of a charged individual for crimes against a child and you turn around and call me a pedophile fan. And then, through some miracle of thought, you link me to a foreign government. What are you, 14? That's not an attack on your person it's a reasonable question based on the level of your thought processes. I used to be a school teacher so I'm very aware of adolescent thinking.
An older person that travels to Las Vegas to solicit sex from a non-professional sex worker that they believe is barely 18 is a scumbag.
It's worse, he thought she was 15, GROSS! Why are Jews so gross?
Because they think they have a special god, a special book, and special rights to real estate that entitles them to torture and murder anyone who gets in the way. Israel uses US foreign aid to lobby/buy the US Congress, which then further fuels its sense of entitlement. That's not conspiracy, it's math.
Oh I know, I know very well indeed, come subscribe to my Substack and I have a whole large community of people who love discussing this subject.
Fine, an older person that solicits sex from a non-professional sex worker that they believe is barely 18 is a scumbag.
what about a wealthy 37 year old lawyer and a 19 year old favella boy?
A foreign national charged in the United States with a major crime normally has their passport confiscated as part of the bail proceeding. Foreign Nationals are considered a high flight risk. Your friend the pedophile got special treatment. Are you a member of a pro pedophile organization that's going around defending your members?
He's my friend, and we don't know any Cias. Don't like it? Tough titties, bitch.
Okay Edward it looks like you may be posting a little late at night, which may explain why your words are confusing. What is "Cias" and since I don't know what the word means exactly, how is my comment associated with it?
Normally, when an intelligence-linked official from a close U.S. ally gets into legal trouble here, the arrest is either kept quiet, charges are downgraded, or the whole thing is handled administratively behind the scenes. That’s how the U.S. and its allies usually protect each other’s operatives — no public spectacle, no headlines. In fact, the standard play is to avoid embarrassment at all costs.
But in Alexandrovich’s case, the opposite happened: his name, government position, and ties to Israel’s National Cyber Directorate were splashed across local Vegas media and then global outlets almost immediately. That’s not how you treat someone you’re trying to shield. If this was really about “special treatment,” the simplest way to protect him would’ve been to keep the arrest under wraps.
So the fact that it was so highly publicized actually contradicts the popular claim that he got off easy because “Israel controls the U.S.” If anything, the exposure itself was humiliating for Israel and suggests either a bureaucratic slip — local cops moving ahead before Washington realized who they had — or a deliberate choice to put the story out there as leverage.
I think this is an important wrinkle: the publicity undermines the notion that he was secretly protected, and points instead to either incompetence or a calculated embarrassment.
Fallacy by association. Didn't you go to school? If you believe I'm misinformed by a false statement made by Scott ritter, then you are obligated to cite that with chapter and verse. But you don't because you can't. People like you are driven by unconscious emotions, that's why you don't think because you're just feeling.
States do not have the authority to revoke American passports, let alone foreign ones, so WTF are you talking about?
Nothing was said about revoking a passport, but local police can, and often do, request the arrested to turn in their passport, and to not leave the jurisdiction. I guess I can ask you the same question.
Seems like you've been "doing your own research" by television. State and federal courts can set that type of bail condition. Police can't.
"I thought the issue was allowing an arrested person to keep their passport ..." - You, 12 hours ago.
So poor, lonely Tom couldn’t find a hooker in Vegas? He had to go online? Was every man who went online at this website arrested? I don’t think so. If this website was so legit why was it being monitored for a sting operation?
I doubt a full transcript of what was said has been released.
Responding to alleged outrage is adorable. You picked a conspicuously easy target to critique. Why not address the way Epstein met Dershowitz? Not conducive to your absolution of Epstein and Israel?
Isn’t there some way you can blame Giuffre for this too? I don’t know why you think you need to appease or refute the internet bandwagon. You could do journalism. Like a journalist. And let the chips fall where they may. Prefacing your story as a public service is on brand for you.
So Dershowitz met Epstein through Lynn Rothschild and this proves, something something, Jewish power.
More dot connecting. Yawn.
Underselling it a bit aren’t we? He said that Clinton and numerous others met Epstein through this Rothschild. Not just any random Jew. Kinda the epicenter of conspiracy don’t you think? Weird that I’ve been following this saga for years and never heard anything about that. And infinitely more interesting than random nobody trying to leave the country to avoid pedo charges.
Sure, I think you encapsulated it correctly: "Kinda the epicenter of conspiracy don't you thing?" Conspiracy of what?
- Lynn Forester de Rothschild married into the family, she is not a Rothschild by birth. Does this mean she is NOT up to crazy shit. No, but just yelling "Oh look, a Rothschild" is called guilt by association.
- Forester de Rothschild was a big time political donor to the Clintons and other Democratic politicians until Obama. Then she switched to supporting Republicans including McCain, Romney, and John Huntsman. Does this mean that all three of those were compromised by Jeffrey Epstein? If you're answer is "yes", please explain. Don't just say something like "connect the dots".
In short, any association with a well-known person like a member of the Rothschilds is indeed conspicuous, but please explain why it is more than just that.
All you have to write Rothschild and the ‘Jewish bankers run the world’ will start coming out of the woodwork. Is like saying Trump in a crowd of blue hair progressives
How did Epstein meet Dershowitz?
Who cares?
https://youtu.be/gHyuW3URYB8?si=heyc8tOacrJIkSKt
2 minutes mark. But the entire interview was revealing.
You whine when he doesn't address this, and now you whine when he does.
You whine when he doesn't address this, and now you whine when he does.
You're spoiling everybody's fun, Mr. Tracey!
I really cannot see how these types of operations are not considered entrapment. It seems to me that the only reason law enforcement get away with it is because of the subject matter.
Actually, in this case as described, it wasn't even entrapment as there was no evidence.
My next door neighbor was correctly caught by an operation similar to this. Correctly in that he was specifically looking for significantly underage girls on the internet to have sex with and after a police woman posing as a girl told him she was fifteen he asked her to meet him. And they met in a hotel room etc etc.
He was 50 and his wife was devastated.
In my neighbor's case it wasn't entrapment, apparently he had been doing this for a while.
I’ve read the details of probable cause and declaration for arrest which in most jurisdictions means the investigating officer is stating facts under penalty of perjury. In the declaration, the detective doesn’t go into great specifics about the online conversation between Tom Alexdrovich and the decoy other than to say they made arrangements to meet somewhere and Alexdrovich agreed to bring a condom. The task force recorded the online conversation and the declaration states the decoy was “acting as a 15 year old female.” I’d be flabbergasted if the decoy didn’t make some reference to her purported age.
Pure’s terms of service are not going to a defense to this charge. Lots of dudes have tried to fight statutory rape charges on the grounds that they met someone in 21 & up bar. Doesn’t work.
By posting the 10k bail, Alexdrovich waived a probable cause hearing. Had Alexdrovich stayed incarcerated in Nevada, the investigating officer might have been forced to put forward some evidence that Alexdrovich knew this girl was underage.
Thanks for the clarification. I puzzled about two things here: can the police be so incompetent as to not have clearly indicated that she was under age. And on the flip side, I can't figure out why Michael Tracey wouldn't also be hip to what you describe.
A .pdf of the probable cause document I’m talking about is up on “Breaking Points” Locals channel. I assume Michael Tracy could post a copy here. There is enough to establish probable cause, but a prosecutor will need to produce more evidence to secure a conviction at trial. Again, the detective states the police recorded the online interaction between Alexdrovich & the decoy.
The question is whether this dude is going to show up at his trial.
Isn’t the lack of specifics reason to be suspicious? If the person clearly said “I AM A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL,” wouldn’t you put that in the affidavit?
Well that’s why you have trials where the government is obligated to provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Probably 95% of the affidavit prior to the narrative concerning Alexdrovich’s interview is cut & paste.
Well, knew the imaginary hypothetical girl was underage. There was no underage girl.
180 degree disagree. Police put out bait cars to catch auto burglars & car thieves. I wish they would do the same with bait bicycles. If the decoy makes it clear to the dude online she’s underage, (hell if she even hints at it) the dude should end any sex talk with her immediately.
Alexdrovich took action to meet this decoy in the physical world. I got zero problems prosecuting folks who chat up people and try to arrange sex with when they know or should know the person is underage.
I don’t think you put people in prison for hints.
In any case, we agree that if the bait person said he/she/it was underage, then sex talk or meeting for sex is a crime.
We know he was using an app for people over 18 that does age verification. We don’t know precisely what was said by the bait person, and that is the critical fact.
I don’t disagree with you. What I put in brackets about hints is common sense, not the standard for incarcerating someone.
Uh in what jurisdictions does a defendant waive a PC hearing for posting bail?
https://www.shouselaw.com/nv/defense/process/48-hour-hearings/. I’m not an expert in Nevada criminal procedure, but here’s a layman’s breakdown with citations. Don’t confuse a probable cause determination with a preliminary hearing.
Well hot damn that’s just not a thing in my jurisdiction
Yes, it was entrapment. Just because he had been doing it doesn't make meeting a police officer posing as a teenage girl a crime.
So how do you suggest we catch pedos, let them rape children first you vile piece of shit?
This is all dumb entrapment with no victim or potential victim ever existing. Prison planet bs to give the system jobs.
Yes Jew pedos aren’t a thing, oh wait…
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/tens-of-thousands-of-pedophiles-operate-in-israel-every-year-637393
It’s the Jerusalem Post, so be sure to smear them as “anti-Semites.”
Do you ever leave your mother's basement?
Don't deny the existence of pedo nor the media propensity to create division so people can hate the Jews instead of the rich people raping kids and your wallet.
Who are Jews. Who do you think run and staff the banks? Who are the Wall St. “investor” parasites and who are the landlords?
Jews who are vastly overrepresented compared to their 2 percent of the population.
It is entrampment, and they are more political than anything else. In order for there to be a crime, the subject has to have actually committed a crime. That's one of the problems with the modern judicial system.
If you agree to meet an underage girl and talk about bringing condoms you know what was planned to happen you pedo defending sick fuck.
My car can go 100 and I love to drive fast so I deserve a speeding ticket before I get in my car.
False metaphor is false, want a do over?
You want it so bad, so pause and imagine for one moment the world with no Jews. What would be different for you?
Then look up metaphor, you don't know what it means.
And I do know what metaphor means, I have a philosophy degree from Oberlin College one of the best liberal arts colleges in the country.
It would be fantastic, no more forever wars, we could bring all our soldiers home and shrink the military by 90%. We could also strip the Jew banks and Jew landlords of their assets they got not through any kind of work, but from having inherited money in the first place. The peace divided, and stolen Jew assets dividends alone would tens of thousands of dollars for every man, woman, and child. Not to mention to end of porn and queer and other woke bullshit being shoved down our throats, no AIPAC buying our politicians, no more hate on people for being born white. It would be paradise on Earth.
He should not have been allowed to leave the country. A judge should have noticed, given Israel's past history of failing to cooperate with extradition requests in this exact type of case, that this guy was a flight risk.
And the US attorney, a person with a lot of power and responsibility in this case, a person whose job is to represent America and American interests, should've asked a judge to take the guy's passport. But, strangely, the US attorney did not do that. Oh, and also strangely, the US attorney was born in Israel and has dual citizenship.
And Michael Tracey's response is "Nothing to see here, folks."
If this had occurred in a vacuum, your "argument" might stand, but as Greyzone and others have exposed, "israel" is a paedo haven, both for Jewish foreigners fleeing persecution as well as homegrown crimes. The rape culture in "israel" is also well known, and attested to by myriad IOF abuses of the investigative process of female IOF victims as well as Palestinian detainees. What else should we expect of a nation that seriously argues that sexual torture by the state should not be prosecuted. How many passages of the Talmud clearly give consent and approval for the sexual assault of "goyim"?
None. The answer to your last question is none. You can drag up a couple frequently misrepresented quotes that are full on lies, otherwise you have nothing there.
Tons of these high profile cases do end up getting extradited like Leifer and extradition loopholes closed.
You sound like a real genius though so I’m going to assume you’re right so no need to respond.
Tons, eh? Citation needed, chum. Show us the convictions, oh, and also the early releases. Take your time..
Hey genius, I said no need to respond. You’ve got it all figured out. Antisemitic conspiracy theorists have always had it right, that’s why they have 2000 years of nonsensical whining with nothing to show for it. But Leifer, kranczer, Karow, and Roemer just to start. I’m starting to think you lot ARE actually inferior to those wily sex perverts.
Stop bloviating and deflecting and answer the question at hand. By all accounts, "israel" is paedo/rapist shangri-la, which you would refute..if you re able? Still, we wait..
Telling people "don't reply" in no way advances your assertions as valid, in fact, it's cowardly, and typical of a zionist reply.
https://borgenproject.org/child-marriage-in-palestine/
Fleeing prosecution
Why are you and your commenters so befuddled by the concept of a sting operation? Have you never watched Chris Hansen? Sting operations aren’t entrapment so long as you don’t coerce the person into doing things they wouldn’t otherwise do. These cases almost always result in the person being found guilty.
Thank God we got this Jewish child sex predator off the streets.
I didn’t know Glenn Greenwald was arrested
Did you fail to read the article?
There is no evidence he was "child sex predator" yet.
Okay but should we be assuming the FBI charged this guy without the decoy claiming to be underage?! That's a pretty big blunder. Maybe it happened but its pretty unlikely. This article is disturbing. MT seems to be more concerned with offering up unlikely excuses for the crime and even suggesting that trapping sexual predators is a waste of tax payers money.
I do believe Scott Ritter spent several years in prison for the same
Ritter got caught at least three times, knowingly going for 14 and 15 year olds. He masturbated on cam, unprompted, for at least one of them - in 2009. He was an early adopter of that technology.
I don't care what's true or not. Being an Israeli he should have been treated like a criminal. Don't trust them f...
I like the way you approach it. If there is no evidence that he thought the girl was underage, there is no case, since the entrapment officer was clearly of age. If she let slip during the conversation a subtle reference to being underage, they would have to prove he picked up on it. In any case, it's clearly entrapment since there is no evidence whatsoever he would have been involved in any way with underaged girls had it not been for law "enforcement" efforts.
"if only to demonstrate that I’m not suspiciously reluctant to address whatever information people think proves me wrong"
I'll read the rest of your essay during the day. But don't go down this road, of trying to prove things to people. Stay anchored to reporting events and engaging in objective analysis.
Earlier I asked Ryan Grim in his comments section if any attempt was made to find out how Alexandrovich returned to Israel. Mr. Grim did not respond. Would you happen to know?
Did Alexandrovich return to Israel via chartered flight or commercial airlines? If he had been considered to be fleeing on August 6, there should’ve been at least one chance to intercept him before he left U.S. airspace. He almost certainly would’ve had to land in between Vegas-to-East Coast and East Coast-to-Transatlantic. So there must be either an FAA flight log or passenger record, yes? Also, the other individuals arrested were allowed to post bond, yes? Alexandrovich is due back in court next Wednesday (8/27), yes? So at this point, this really isn’t even an international incident yet, no?
We don’t gotta be unbiased. But we do gotta be fair.
If he does not miss his court date, then he is not fleeing. With all the attention it's getting, I would be surprised if he does not show up.
I agree with you
Terms of service is completely irrelevant. An age was disclosed, he believed it, he said to bring condoms.
Not just that, but it's completely tone deaf to suggest that because there was no real victim there was no crime. A real 15 year old could have showed up in that uber. It was more than fantasy or role play.
Innocent people don’t run
If he comes back for his court date, I am wrong, if he doesn’t, he ran
Michael Tracey sure seems to be talking a lot of Hasbara for pedos as of late. West Caldwell is shook rn.