32 Comments

To all those criticizing MT for picking an individual to profile whose pathetic excuse for “journalism” is a case study that illustrates a larger point, note this is exactly the kind of thing NPR/NYT/WAPO/CNN do every day. They develop a narrative that makes them feel virtuous, hunt for an individual whose story can be shown to demonstrate the narrative in real life, as though it serves as proof of their worldview, and expect us to believe this is “Evidence”. The test, for me, is whether generalizing from the case to the wider world is rational and from a scientific point of view, reproducible across larger data sets in similar settings.

MT has made the case already that this person is not an isolated case, but rather a common phenotype in modern “journalism”. So he passes that bar IMHO, with much greater credibility than the MSM entities who are on a mission to change the world.

Stern spends his days pouring gasoline on the divisive bonfires consuming the culture, getting the transgressive thrill that comes from the same place that drives vandalism and pyromania. He chooses to do so in public, and evinces no cognitive dissonance that would reveal any self-awareness of his vacuity. So no pity is due this cretinous parasite. Live by the sword....

What I do think would be useful, and responsive to some of the criticism, is further exploration of the ecosystem that drives and rewards such people. Stern has supervising editors somewhere at the Daily Beast; who are they and why do they hire and promote such weak thinkers? How do advertisers square their inexplicable desire to appear as sponsors of this trash with their corporate image? How does it make their employees or customers feel that they are spending shareholder assets funding this useless tripe?

Going back to his training, how do the overpaid hacks at Columbia where he was indoctrinated with this perspective justify their existence? How do the “thought leaders” in the field, like Jay Rosen at NYU (PressThink) understand their role in creating a US version of Pravda? Let’s follow the breadcrumbs from Stern, whose career has become a public embarrassment, to those up the food chain who trained and motivated him to be such a waste of space. I think it is time to “punch up”, to use the frame of the critics here.

Expand full comment

It's truly disgusting that "journalism" has come to this. Keep calling them out, Michael. They're destroying/have destroyed a once (semi) noble profession.

Expand full comment

The guy works for an outfit where holding up powerless private citizens for public ridicule is part of the business model. No sympathy

Expand full comment

Frankly this seems mean. The guy is by your own admission a hugely underachieving irrelevance, who has used his immense wealth, privilege and connections to end up doing... well, nothing much. It hardly seems to merit an article.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Apr 8, 2021
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I find it fascinating how I, here on my lowly Substack, could be accused of "punching down" at a Senior Editor employed by one of the most prominent online media organizations in the United States -- particularly a Senior Editor who's had no compunction about trolling me repeatedly for several years straight. But, OK

Expand full comment

"Trolling" you? More like, "senior editorializing" you. Have some respect for the office!

Expand full comment

It means, Michael, you're winning.

Expand full comment

If he was trolling you, the. I take back my own "punching down" comment. If he made it personal before then he's fair game.

You very effectively communicated why this human being is a total failure.

Like most things, its the truth that hurts.

And man, there is a lotta truth in that piece.

Expand full comment

Maybe a little too subtle for Marlow, but I enjoyed it.

Expand full comment

5000 people who have spent the last five years accusing you of being a neo-Nazi and/or a Russian spy and/or a sexual predator—while relentlessly baiting you with ugly remarks about your appearance—will now wonder aloud: “doesn’t Michael Tracey have better things to write about?”

Expand full comment

Sarcasm, the latest tool by a Substack Journalist to inflict pain and suffering on innocent "writers" & "Senior Editors". Love it!

Expand full comment

This dude is definitely obnoxious. But this does seem a bit meaner than necessary. Maybe you could inform your dear readers as to what exactly Marlow did to merit this level of vitriol? Otherwise, this seems a bit like screaming and hollering at snobby store clerk for being snotty toward you. Use your Jersey to take down bigger targets instead. Love your work!

Expand full comment

Yes, I did feel like I'm missing some context here . . .

Expand full comment

subscribed

Expand full comment

This kind of fish-in-a-barrel piece isn’t worth your time or your readers. Whatever Mr. Stern has otherwise done to enrage you to the point you thought this screed was worth writing, you should have enjoyed the catharsis of creating it, then put in your “not for publication” folder and moved on to do something that you and your readership could have learned from.

Expand full comment

I now understand why duels were popular.

Expand full comment

Love your snarky tone. At first I thought you were serious about his talents. But now I see he is a spoiled child with no ambition but to get paid each week and promote the progressive left wing BS. I never heard of him and wouldn’t read the daily beast if you paid me. Don’t think I have ever read it.

Expand full comment

Those of you criticizing MT for "punching down" appear to be missing the point. Keep punching, Michael. Please.

Expand full comment

Coddled privilege really is something. Profiles in journalistic courage would be a welcome addition to your substack. I would like to nominate Jim Acosta for your next piece.

Expand full comment

I like you Tracey, and clearly Marlow was way out of his depth questioning Greenwalds journalistic credentials.

But this is so brutal that I feel sorry for Marlow. Literally, the emotion I have right now is pity. This guy spent a ton of money, and is maybe still paying off his student loans, to write fluff articles on the daily beast, of all publications.

It's very true that this guy is basically a nothing, but that also means you are punching down, and punching down HARD

Expand full comment

I disagree. When woke activists attempt to slander legitimate journalists and have them canceled, I think it's entirely fair to not-so-subtly point out that they have contributed literally nothing of value to the field. Tracey is punching up, and should punch harder if anything.

Expand full comment

Well, as the world of the Woke pretends to combat “White Privilege”, like Al Gore fights climate change with his jet. Politicians, Media firms, Publishers, Hollywood and alike continue telling everyone else how to behave. In the “wake of the woke”, we get Marlow, but more notably, Chelsea Clinton, Anderson Cooper (Vanderbilt), Nicholas Cage (Coppola) Chris Cuomo, GW Bush (to be fair) and others that might otherwise have been relegated to the cutting room floor. That said, our standards continue to be lowered and privileged of those in power is not likely to stop... special thanks to Hunter Biden’s who add to his resume a new skill of “best selling writer” and honorable mention to Lori Lougnlin!

Expand full comment