When Congress passed the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, it was hailed as a monumental step forward in the critical fight against “modern-day slavery.” And who could possibly be against fighting slavery? Our history class textbooks might have taught us we got rid of it during the Civil War, but sometime around the turn of the 21st Century, an impressively diverse cross-section of NGO activists, politicians, and law enforcement officials began gravely informing the public that “slavery” never actually went away, and in fact remained shockingly pervasive. Resolute action, they explained, would be needed at once to stamp out this hidden scourge.
Ask people to define the major crimes-robbery, shoplifting, murder, carjacking, etc.-and you'll get uniformly correct answers. Ask people to define sex trafficking and you'll not only get wrong answers, you'll get a different answer from everyone you ask! Even people most hysterically obsessed with the notion couldn't correctly define it with a gun to their head.
In 2011, Virginia Giuffre writes a 100 page memoir where she uses the word trafficking just once to describe not Jeffrey Epstein but another man who was apparently smuggling in prostitutes from Eastern Europe. By the end of the decade, the word trafficking has morphed to a degree that Giuffre can claim to have been "trafficked" and be the very face of trafficking victims.
Great article, but I think it should have been published in a print magazine or Compact or Quilette.
The younger sister of a guy I know was charged with sex trafficking in Washington (I dont remember if she was convicted) and while I dont remember the details I remember at the time from the newspaper story it sounded a lot like they just went across the state with a prostitute they were doing heroin with.
BRILLIANT article Michael, everything you said is so spot on. There is an attack on MEN and menopausal WHORES are grifting as victims. And the LAW is behind them, and the LAW & media ARE JOINED AT THE HIPS and work together to tag team the defendant before it even goes to trial. It's political Michael. The vultures in the LAW want to CONTROL MEN and w0e-MEN are the vehicle to do it now, w0e-MEN have been weaponized against MEN and as you so eloquently stated throughout crimes are being INVENTED that aren't really crimes and MEN are being criminalized for any kind of sexual liaison with a fe-MALE, in fact the LAW is FISHING for MEN and expanding the definition of rape/sexual assault/ so as to justify the sex crimes industry, because aCTUAL rape & trafficking is so rare it wouldn't feed the sex crimes industry. In summary: We now have statutory rape laws for ADULT w0e-MEN!
Who could be against legislation fighting slavery and exploitation?
I can think of one fat moron mouth breather who mocks such things by eating pizza on his podcast. Every legitimate associate you’ve ever collaborated with has dropped you like a fat bloviating filibustering hot rock.
Only FOOLS don't see the overreach and the unjustified criminalization of MEN who didn't actually do the things they are being FRAMED for. You think like a menopausal w0e-MAN, believing in gossip, ZERO critical thinking skills, ZERO objectivity, ZERO research, gyn0-centric BETA/CUCK/SIMP
Every point Michael makes here is SPOT ON and shows what perilous times we live in where MEN are being hunted and branded for FAKE crimes they didn't even commit, due to ANY sexual encounter they had could be made criminal using w0e-MEN as bait trapping MEN for FAKE INVENTED crimes just to feed the sex crimes industry
I bet you are a pedophile. Convicted, claiming innocence, likely brain damaged. Probably traumatized by society’s willingness to remind you that you’re a pathetic homely little fella. Maybe instead of destroying another child’s innocence you should go fuck yourself instead.
"bro really read 3000 words on government overreach and his only two brain cells rubbed together to say 'durr u eat pizza so u pro slavery'. literal room temp iq on full display. nobody is defending real slavery u absolute clown shoe, the article just proved the feds hijacked the word to lock dudes up over bad tinder dates and 100 bucks. skipping straight to fat jokes cuz ur reading comprehension peaked in 3rd grade and u got zero actual counter arguments. deeply embarrassing for u honestly. log off."
Ask people to define the major crimes-robbery, shoplifting, murder, carjacking, etc.-and you'll get uniformly correct answers. Ask people to define sex trafficking and you'll not only get wrong answers, you'll get a different answer from everyone you ask! Even people most hysterically obsessed with the notion couldn't correctly define it with a gun to their head.
In 2011, Virginia Giuffre writes a 100 page memoir where she uses the word trafficking just once to describe not Jeffrey Epstein but another man who was apparently smuggling in prostitutes from Eastern Europe. By the end of the decade, the word trafficking has morphed to a degree that Giuffre can claim to have been "trafficked" and be the very face of trafficking victims.
Great article, but I think it should have been published in a print magazine or Compact or Quilette.
The younger sister of a guy I know was charged with sex trafficking in Washington (I dont remember if she was convicted) and while I dont remember the details I remember at the time from the newspaper story it sounded a lot like they just went across the state with a prostitute they were doing heroin with.
BRILLIANT article Michael, everything you said is so spot on. There is an attack on MEN and menopausal WHORES are grifting as victims. And the LAW is behind them, and the LAW & media ARE JOINED AT THE HIPS and work together to tag team the defendant before it even goes to trial. It's political Michael. The vultures in the LAW want to CONTROL MEN and w0e-MEN are the vehicle to do it now, w0e-MEN have been weaponized against MEN and as you so eloquently stated throughout crimes are being INVENTED that aren't really crimes and MEN are being criminalized for any kind of sexual liaison with a fe-MALE, in fact the LAW is FISHING for MEN and expanding the definition of rape/sexual assault/ so as to justify the sex crimes industry, because aCTUAL rape & trafficking is so rare it wouldn't feed the sex crimes industry. In summary: We now have statutory rape laws for ADULT w0e-MEN!
Who could be against legislation fighting slavery and exploitation?
I can think of one fat moron mouth breather who mocks such things by eating pizza on his podcast. Every legitimate associate you’ve ever collaborated with has dropped you like a fat bloviating filibustering hot rock.
Only FOOLS don't see the overreach and the unjustified criminalization of MEN who didn't actually do the things they are being FRAMED for. You think like a menopausal w0e-MAN, believing in gossip, ZERO critical thinking skills, ZERO objectivity, ZERO research, gyn0-centric BETA/CUCK/SIMP
Every point Michael makes here is SPOT ON and shows what perilous times we live in where MEN are being hunted and branded for FAKE crimes they didn't even commit, due to ANY sexual encounter they had could be made criminal using w0e-MEN as bait trapping MEN for FAKE INVENTED crimes just to feed the sex crimes industry
I bet you are a pedophile. Convicted, claiming innocence, likely brain damaged. Probably traumatized by society’s willingness to remind you that you’re a pathetic homely little fella. Maybe instead of destroying another child’s innocence you should go fuck yourself instead.
As the liberals and Democrats loved to do for 50 years: If you are anti pedophile, it means YOU ARE THE REAL ONE BRUH!!!!!
you PEDOPHILEPHOBE with a kid in your closet!!
"bro really read 3000 words on government overreach and his only two brain cells rubbed together to say 'durr u eat pizza so u pro slavery'. literal room temp iq on full display. nobody is defending real slavery u absolute clown shoe, the article just proved the feds hijacked the word to lock dudes up over bad tinder dates and 100 bucks. skipping straight to fat jokes cuz ur reading comprehension peaked in 3rd grade and u got zero actual counter arguments. deeply embarrassing for u honestly. log off."